While we may all agree that what happened in Benghazi was horrific and tragically sad, after the report concluded, this is what was showing on the banners at the bottom of each news organization's screen shot:
CNN - "GOP-Led Panel Finds No Wrong Doing by Clinton"
FOX - "Republicans Accuse Obama Administration of Blocking Documents and Witnesses in Benghazi Attack Probe"
What?! They were exposed to the same information in the press conference, yet their take away messages differed so drastically?
During the press conference that offered the 800 page document, one reporter suggested that it is likely that the lenses through which individuals view this story will remain unchanged. Researchers in psychology are likely to agree with the reporter.
What can we do?
Just as triangulation is relied upon to build credibility in some research methodologies, we can seek varied perspectives and evidence to challenge ourselves to deeper understanding and better solutions. Our campus is continuing its Critical Thinking Institute and commitment to Positive Social Change skill building and initiatives ... I hope we are all watching different news stations and digging deep and wide in our research (more than 3 sources, more than triangulation!).
Hmmmmm ... how open are we, really, to ideas that differ from our current thinking or from our favorite news station?
